Bruce R. Thomas, Kent J. Bradford
Seed Biotechnology Center, Univ. California, Davis
(http://sbc.ucdavis.edu)(email:
sbc@ucdavis.edu)
Lecture at Dairy Cattle Day, UC Davis, March 21, 2001
Presentation Graphics, Notes & Bibliography
http://sbc.ucdavis.edu/outreach/lecture/DairyDayMarch2001.htm
Streaming media presentation. Run time: 10 minutes.
A. Those who want to view streaming
media must install RealPlayer software on their computers.
FREE
download of RealPlayer
"basic version" software.
B. Additional instructions for RealPlayer
software setup.
RealPlayer
software - setup protocol
C. Feedback form -
please let us know what you think of information delivered
via streaming media
Transgenic Crop Traits. Among the transgenic crop
plants approved by APHIS for commercial production in the US are canola,
corn, cotton and soybeans engineered for herbicide compatibility and protection
against insects. Herbicide tolerance in transgenic crops provides
better weed control and improves soil conservation. Bt genes help
to control insects in transgenic crops. Mycotoxin contents are reduced
in transgenic plants due to reduced insect feeding and fewer damaged sites
at which fungal infection of the crop plant can occur. Engineering
pest protection traits into the seed may reduce the need for pesticide
chemicals in crop production, and may enable the grower to choose pesticides
that are less harmful to the environment. Recent economic studies
document benefits of transgenic crops including yield increases, cost savings
to growers and reductions in chemical application. These benefits
have led to rapid adoption of transgenic crops on over 100 million acres
worldwide.
USDA APHIS
- New List of De-Regulated Crops
http://www.aphis.usda.gov/biotech/not_reg.html
Agricultural
Biotechnology Briefing Room, ERS/USDA
http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/Biotechnology/
Impacts
of adopting genetically engineered crops in the United States, ERS USDA
07mar2001
http://www.ers.usda.gov/Emphases/Harmony/issues/genengcrops/genengcrops.htm
Agronomic
& Economic Assessment of Transgenic Canola, Canola Council of Canada
jan2001
http://www.canola-council.org/manual/GMO/gmo_main.htm
ISAAA
Brief No. 21 - 2000 : Global Status of Commercialized Transgenic Crops
http://www.canola-council.org/manual/GMO/gmo_main.htm
US Government Regulation of Transgenic Crops. The
use of crops produced via biotechnology is regulated by a number of US
government agencies. The USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service (APHIS) regulates field-testing of biotechnology-derived plant
varieties. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is the lead agency
for evaluating crop plants with pesticidal traits developed via biotechnology.
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is the primary agency regulating
the safety of foods developed via biotechnology. USDA has recently published
new regulations for organic agriculture certification that exclude the
use of transgenic crop plants and some other production technologies that
are used in conventional agriculture. An additional consumer choice is
provided by recent FDA regulations for voluntary labeling of foods produced
without transgenic ingredients.
USDA - Agricultural Biotechnology
http://www.aphis.usda.gov/bbep/bp/
EPA - Biopesticides
http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/biopesticides/
FDA - Center for Food Safety and
Applied Nutrition
http://vm.cfsan.fda.gov/
National
Organic Standards - Final Rule
http://www.ams.usda.gov/nop/nop2000/nop/finalrulepages/finalrulemap.htm
FDA - voluntary
labeling of foods produced without transgenic ingredients
http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/biolabgu.html
International Government Regulation of Transgenic Crops.
Export markets for transgenic crops are very complicated at present. Public
reactions to transgenics in other countries vary widely. Many governments
are still setting up mechanisms to regulate biotechnology crops and food
products. Two recent developments demonstrate some progress.
The European Union Parliament recently repealed the moratorium on approval
of new genetically modified (GM) food crops. Japan has set reasonable
tolerance limits for small amounts of unintentional transgenic content
in shipments of conventional crop products.
Repeal
of moratorium on GMO release into the environment, European Parliament
29jan2001
http://www2.europarl.eu.int/omk/OM-Europarl?PROG=REPORT&L=EN&PUBREF=-//EP//TEXT
+REPORT+A5-2001-0032+0+NOT+SGML+V0//EN
The
future of the biotechnology industry, Reports of the European Parliament
28feb2001
http://www2.europarl.eu.int/omk/OM-Europarl?PROG=REPORT&L=EN&PUBREF=-//EP//TEXT
+REPORT+A5-2001-0080+0+NOT+SGML+V0//EN
European
Union parliament pledges support for GM technologies, Reuters 15march2001
http://www.plant.uoguelph.ca/safefood/archives/agnet/2001/3-2001/ag-03-15-01-02.txt
Japan
to allow foods to contain up to 5 percent biotech, Tokyo (AP) 20march2001
http://agbioview.listbot.com/cgi-bin/subscriber?Act=view_message&list_id=agbioview&msg_num=1017&start_num=
Consumer survey. A recent public survey in the US demonstrated
that a majority expect biotechnology to provide benefits. When asked
about food safety issues, very few people indicated any concerns about
biotechnology in foods. Thus, in the US we are generally optimistic
about biotechnology and believe that government regulation of the technology
is working to protect public safety.
Wirthlin
Group Quorum Survey of consumers in USA, Jan 2001
http://ific.org/ (What's New at IFIC)
Feeding trials. Feeding trials have demonstrated
the safety and effectiveness of feeds derived from transgenic crop plants.
Transgenic feeds are digested normally, so there is no effect on safety
of meat, milk or eggs produced by the livestock.
GM
Food Safety Assessment - Resource Series
http://sbc.ucdavis.edu/outreach/resource/gm_food_safety.htm
Crop
Biotechnology: Feeds for Livestock
http://sbc.ucdavis.edu/outreach/lecture/livestock_feeds.htm
US government regulators have worked to establish public confidence in their ability to ensure the environmental and food safety of crop plants developed using biotechnology. Export markets for transgenic crops are complicated by wide variability in international government regulations and consumer reactions to biotechnology.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Dr. Kent J. Bradford
Director |
Dr. Bruce R. Thomas
Technical Director |
Susan Webster
Program Representative |